Archive

Posts Tagged ‘movies’

Zombies 101

September 8, 2010 Leave a comment

The Washington Post has a very interesting article about a new course being offered at the University of Baltimore. The course titled Media Genres: Zombies is being taught by Arnold Blumberg who co-wrote the book Zombiemania80 Movies To Die For.

Exploring the undead: University of Baltimore to offer English class on zombies

By Daniel de Vise
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, September 8, 2010

Is “Night of the Living Dead” a simple zombie film or a subtle antiwar statement? Precisely when did viral pandemic supplant nuclear radiation as the lead cause of zombification? And which sort of animated dead has the greater potential to frighten: shambler or sprinter?

Those questions and others will be laid to rest — and then gruesomely revivified — in a new 300-level course at the University of Baltimore titled “Media Genres: Zombies.”

Arnold Blumberg, a lifelong enthusiast of popular culture in general and zombie films in particular, is among the first university professors to devote an entire semester to study of the reawakened dead. His course, and recent offerings at Columbia College and Georgia Tech, share a common interest in the zombie movie as expression of zeitgeist.

Zombies have clawed their way to the center of popular culture over the past decade in a series of big-budget mainstream films. There was “28 Days Later,” a 2002 British production that revived the genre with hip London zombies that were supremely athletic if not, strictly speaking, dead. And “Dawn of the Dead,” a 2004 remake of a George A. Romero classic. And “Shaun of the Dead,” the definitive satire. And “Zombieland,” the slightly less-definitive satire.

I’ve seen Night of the Living Dead, the original Dawn of the Dead and 28 Days Later which stars Naomie Harris.

Blumberg is curator of Geppi’s Entertainment Museum, a shrine to popular culture at Baltimore’s Camden Yards. He has degrees from the University of Baltimore and the University of Maryland Baltimore County and co-wrote the book “Zombiemania,” a scholarly interest possibly surpassed only by his love for the venerable British science-fiction series “Dr. Who”. He teaches a UMBC course on the comic book as literature.

“Zombiemania” examines 80 zombie movies “to die for.” The zombie course covers a mere 16 “classic” titles, from the 1932 Bela Lugosi vehicle “White Zombie” through 2009′s “Zombieland,” the highest-grossing zombie film to date.

I haven’t seen Zombieland but I will be adding it to my Netflix queue.

You can read more about the course that’s offered by Mr. Blumberg at the  University of Baltimore website.  This sounds like such a cool course ;-)

For Colored Girls

September 6, 2010 Leave a comment

A picture of the cast of Tyler Perry’s For Colored Girls Who Have Considered Suicide When the Rainbow Is Enuf has been released.

I first saw the picture in the current issue of Essence Magazine. The film is one of those once in a blue moon releases that features black actresses in starring roles. The cast includes Kerry Washington, Anika Noni Rose, Whoopi Goldberg, Thandie Newton, Janet Jackson, Loretta Devine, Phylicia Rashad, Kimberly Elise and Tessa Thompson.

The movie is based on the play by Ntozake Shange.  The play has appeared on and off Broadway.  For Colored Girls was nominated for a Tony Award for Best Play and won an Obie Award in 1977.

Tyler Perry wrote, produced and directed the movie. And that’s where the controversy begins. When it was first announced that this movie would be in Tyler Perry’s hands some folks weren’t happy. Some black folks have a problem with Tyler’s films so they’re expecting the worse with For Colored Girls. Lionsgate, which is releasing the film has changed the release date from January 2011 to November 2010.  Looks like Lionsgate is thinking about awards season.

RIP Vonetta McGee

July 16, 2010 1 comment

Actress Vonetta McGee passed away on July 9.  The cause of death was cardiac arrest.

Vonetta appeared in what many folks called back on the 70′s blaxploitation pictures including Blacula, Shaft in Africa and Hammer. Vonetta also starred in Thomasine and Bushrod, The Eiger Sanction and Detroit 9000.

Vonetta was married to actor Carl Lumbly and she is survived by Carl, their son Brandon, her mother, Alma McGee, three brothers, Donald, Richard and Ronald McGee and a sister, Alma McGee.

Vonetta McGee, Film and TV Actress, Dies at 65
By MARGALIT FOX

Vonetta McGee, a film and television actress originally known for blaxploitation pictures like “Blacula,” “Hammer” and “Shaft in Africa,” died on July 9 in Berkeley, Calif. She was 65 and a Berkeley resident.

The cause was cardiac arrest, said Kelley Nayo, a family spokeswoman.

In “Blacula” (1972), Ms. McGee portrayed the love interest of Mamuwalde (William Marshall), an African prince who, after an ill-fated trip to Transylvania centuries earlier, re-emerges in modern Los Angeles as a member of the thirsty undead.

Reviewing the film in The New York Times, Roger Greenspun called Ms. McGee “just possibly the most beautiful woman currently acting in movies.”

In “Hammer” (1972), Ms. McGee appeared opposite Fred Williamson in the tale of a young black prizefighter. In “Shaft in Africa” (1973), the third installment in the private-eye series starring Richard Roundtree, she played an emir’s daughter.

Ms. McGee’s other films include “The Kremlin Letter” (1970); “Detroit 9000” (1973); “Thomasine & Bushrod” (1974); and “The Eiger Sanction” (1975), directed by and starring Clint Eastwood.

Lawrence Vonetta McGee, named for her father, was born in San Francisco on Jan. 14, 1945. While studying pre-law at San Francisco State College, she became involved in community theater. She left college before graduating to pursue an acting career.

According to a Los Angeles Times article, Vonetta McGee wasn’t fond of the term blaxploitation.

McGee was no fan of the “blaxploitation” label that was attached to many of the films featuring black casts in the ’70s.

That label, she told The Times in 1979, was used “like racism, so you don’t have to think of the individual elements, just the whole. If you study propaganda, you understand how this works.”

Although The Times reported that McGee “calls herself one of the lucky graduates of the black-film genre,” she pointed out that there was a difference between someone like Diana Ross and other potentially marketable black actresses.

“She has had the luxury of a studio behind her,” McGee said. “This is where a lot of us fell short. We all needed a certain amount of protection. But we were on our own.”

RIP Vonetta McGee.

Happy New Year and other things

January 3, 2010 1 comment

I’m late but Happy New Year!!!  Hope everyone is having a great holiday season. I’ve been off from work this past week.   I spent my week either running around doing errands, doing some house cleaning or just chilling out and watching movies such as Revolutionary Road, Welcome Home Roscoe Jenkins, Rush Hour, Wall Street and The Stratton Story just to name a few. Right now I’m watching the original The Taking of Pelham One Two Three (1974).

I’ve been enjoying my time off from work but it’s been cold as heck outside.  Yesterday and today we had some serious winds.  We had a huge snowstorm a couple of weekends ago.  And it was nice being off from work that Monday before Christmas. Uncle Sam rarely shuts down due to snow.  It’s gotta be major for a shutdown.

As you’ve noticed I haven’t been doing much blogging in the past few months.  To be honest I just haven’t been in a blogging mood despite everything going on lately including Tiger Woods and his hoochies and those oh so dreadful Washington Redskins.

For the past week I’ve been trying to decide if I want to buy a usb turntable so I can download my albums and 12 inch singles on my pc.  There’s just so much music I could be listening to on my mp3 player that’s sitting there in album land. I was hanging around Amazon.com a couple of days ago when I saw an album by a group who’s song I loved back in the 80’s.  The song is called Somebody and it’s by a group called Brilliant. They’re a British group who really didn’t make it big here in the U.S.  But Somebody is such a cool song that I bought the 12 inch single when it was released back in the day.  This is an example of songs that I could be listening to on my mp3 player.

Behind the scenes at Netflix

August 2, 2009 1 comment

I read an interesting article about how things work at Netflix.  This article talks about the distribution center in Nashville, TN.

netflix

Netflix’s Nashville center feeds demand for movies
Crew of just 18 handles 24,000 discs every day

By Wendy Lee
THE TENNESSEAN

Before dawn, the workers gather in a nondescript office building. Trucks have arrived from the post office, ready to dump tens of thousands of DVDs sealed in bright red envelopes.
Advertisement

But it doesn’t take an army to deal with more than 24,000 DVD and Blu-ray discs per day that need to be opened, filed away, and redistributed to other expectant movie fans.

It’s here, at Nashville’s Netflix distribution center, where a crew of just 18 sorts through the discs and staffs equipment to scan and stuff them into fresh red envelopes, address them and send them on to customers across Middle Tennessee and the Bowling Green, Ky., area.

Despite a declining economy and increased competition from DVD rental machines in supermarkets and online, Netflix says its business is growing in Nashville and nationwide, and the company recently granted The Tennessean a rare chance to take a look inside its distribution center and study operations.

The Nashville facility opened in 2007 and is one of 58 such plants across the United States. The Los Gatos, Calif.-based business lets customers rent and swap (as well as stream) films and TV shows for a monthly fee.

While checking my emails yesterday I noticed that Netflix received the latest movies I mailed Friday morning and sent out the next group yesterday. I was surprised cause they didn’t use to send out movies and emails during the weekend. Apparently they’ve made some changes.

Check out the entire article here.

Categories: Netflix Tags: , , ,

Texting in the movie theater

May 24, 2009 3 comments

I had a good laugh last week reading John Kelly’s column in the Post about the lack of movie theater etiquette especially when it comes to texting.  I definitely feel his pain on this one. I’ve always had problems with folks talking on the phone in the movie theater. That’s one of the reasons why I don’t go to the movies that often.  Years ago I use to go to the movies at least two to three times a month.  I’ve slowed down to a point where the last film I saw in a movie theater was Why Did I Get Married? And when did that come out? I believe fall of 2007. Yes it’s been that long.   I prefer the comfort of watching movies at home compared to listening to phone conversations and seeing bright lights lit up on cellphone screens while folks text themselves to death in the movie theater.

The unholy union of the movie projector and the cellphone is the latest irritation, not because of people who talk on the phone during a film but because of people who text on it. Almost every time I’ve been at the movies recently, someone has been reading or writing a text on his or her phone, the bright little screen burning distractingly at the periphery of my vision, like some annoying floater shining in the vitreous humor of my eyeball.

I’ve even noticed it at the AFI Silver Theatre, not the sort of place that attracts unruly teens who shout back at the characters. When I saw “The Soloist” last week, a gentleman sitting alone a few rows in front of me spent the first third of the film consulting his phone, its tiny glowing screen competing with Robert Downey Jr. and Jamie Foxx on the big glowing screen.

You see what I mean?

Texting during a movie is rude for a couple of different reasons. There’s the aforementioned distraction — the human brain is now wired to zoom in on any and all screens in view — but there’s also the message that it sends: This movie bores me, says the texter. The rest of you morons may be able to suspend disbelief, convincing yourselves that despite sitting in a dark room clutching a $5 soda and a $5 bag of popcorn you’re really on the Starship Enterprise or in a secret chamber underneath the Vatican. Not me. I’m wired to the outside world.

If a person feels that texting is more important than watching a movie with the morons then why in the hell did they pay to see the movie in the first place!!!!!!!

For me, another problem is that My Lovely Wife gets even more irritated by movie-texting (“mexting”?) than I do. That means I have to worry about her. How much will she embarrass me with her Charles Bronson-style vigilantism? During a recent high-school band concert (it happens there too, and in live theater performances) she walked down to a teenage girl and whispered, in a voice that I’m sure was honey on sharpened steel: “I’m sorry, your iPhone is very distracting. Can you turn it off, please?”

The girl grunted some sort of assent, lowered the phone on her lap about a millimeter then continued to tap away at it.

I convinced my wife that rather than reenact “Death Wish,” we should just move seats. But you can’t always do that, especially when texters are spread throughout the theater like fireflies on a summer’s night.

You see I don’t blame his wife. Rude folks who text during a movie deserve some Bronson style vigilantism.  Why are they sitting in a movie theater in the first place?  If folks are that bored then they should go to the park and text their life away without bothering others.

Will traditional television go by the wayside?

May 16, 2009 1 comment

When it comes to watching your favorite tv shows, could you make the switch from your 27 to 60 inch tv screen to your desktop or laptop?

television

laptop

Even though 99 percent of the country owns at least one television, the number of people watching tv shows on computers and mobile devices such as ipods and cellphones is becoming a growing trend.  Some are saying goodbye to cable tv bills and instead are watching their favorite shows on YouTube or Hulu.com.  And if they want to watch movies they just subcribe to Netflix.

Danny Ledonne rarely misses “The Daily Show.” He’s a frequent viewer of its cable TV cousin, “The Colbert Report,” too. And for additional political satire and commentary, he often checks out HBO’s “Real Time With Bill Maher.”

The thing is, Ledonne doesn’t own a television. He hasn’t had one since he was in college more than eight years ago. When he walks into a friend’s house nowadays and the TV set is on, he says, “It’s like a quaint visit to an alien world.”

These days, Ledonne, 27, can watch all the TV he wants merely by opening his laptop, or going to his cellphone or iPod. With full-length TV programs available all over the Internet (in both legal and pirated form), he finds he does just fine without paying a monthly cable bill — or even having a TV. In industry parlance, he’s among those who have “cut the cord,” no longer tethered to the sources that have delivered programming into the home since television’s inception.

As alternative means of watching “television” rapidly mature, the Danny Ledonnes of the world are at the vanguard of a potentially potent economic and social force. People like him could be poised to do to the broadcasting, cable and satellite TV industries what free music downloads did to the recording industry and free online news has done to newspapers — that is, alter everything about the creation, production and delivery of TV.

Ledonne, for example, can construct an entire TV schedule without ever flicking on a remote control. Thanks to dozens of videocasting Web sites, such as Hulu, TV.com, Joost and Fancast, full-length episodes of more than 90 percent of the shows carried by the major broadcast networks are legally accessible within a day of being broadcast, according to Forrester Research (only about 20 percent of what’s on cable is similarly available). And because online TV programs are always “on,” and cost little more than the price of an Internet connection, Ledonne has gotten used to watching on his own terms.

“I don’t want an arbitrary television schedule telling me when and where I’m supposed to meet it every night or every week,” says Ledonne, a graduate student at American University and a video producer. “I want to watch when I want to, I want to be able to download it and listen on the bike or watch on a plane, and I want to do it for free with minimal advertising. Otherwise, I have better things to do.”

The Sony in the living room isn’t about to vanish, not with almost 99 percent of all American households still owning at least one TV. Nor are the cable or satellite industries in any immediate danger, given that 85 percent of the country still pays for TV service.

Since I grew up watching television on a regular television screen I don’t know if I could make that kind of switch. I know I wouldn’t watch a tv show or movie on my mp3 player or cellphone. The screens are much too small for my old eyes, lol ;-)   I’ve watched a couple of movies on my 17 inch desktop monitor and even then it wasn’t the same as watching a movie on the tv screen.  And besides when it’s a really good tv show like 24 or a movie, I prefer the comfort of my sofa, not an office chair.

The whitewashing continues in Hollywood

April 22, 2009 11 comments

As usual liberal Hollywood is at it again. Last year I blogged about how they whitewashed the film 21. This film was based on a true story in which Asian Americans were the real life leading characters but liberal Hollywood decided to cast white actors in the leading roles instead.  Well this time it’s happening to a film that’s directed by an Indian American.  According to this article there’s a new film coming out titled The Last Airbender which is directed by M. Night Shyamalan.  This film is the live action adaptation of Avatar:  The Last Airbender.

the_last_airbender

Columnist Kim Voynar gives a  quick rundown of the story from her column, Yellow-facing and White-washing:  The Racial Issues Raised by the Casting of The Last Airbender:

Avatar: The Last Airbender, the television series, is heavily Asian-themed. For those who aren’t into Avatar, here’s a quick rundown of the basic story: In the Avatar world, civilization is divided into four separate groups: Earth, Water, Air and Fire, with each nation’s social structure built around its dominant element. Each nation has “benders” who can manipulate their tribe element martial-arts style, and then there is one Avatar each generation who has the ability to bend all four elements, but who has to learn to bend the elements that are not his by birthright (with the element opposite the Avatar’s birthright being the most challenging to learn). There are a lot of Eastern spiritual elements (particulary Hindu) interwoven into the story, including the ability of the Avatar to call on the knowledge of all past Avatars, which resides within him, the opening of chakras, and concepts around reincarnation (really, come to think of it, I’m surprised the religious right hasn’t been all over this show for its “non-Christian” elements).

Despite the fact that this story is heavily Asian themed liberal Hollywood has decided to cast the four leading characters with white actors. The fourth actor has dropped out and replaced by Indian actor Dev Patel from Slumdog Millionaire.  The four original white actors weren’t exactly household names so the casting folks and producers can’t give the lame excuse of they have to hire well  known white actors to open a film.  Some Asian Americans and hard core Avatar fans are fuming over the casting of this film and I don’t blame them.  You mean to tell me liberal Hollywood can’t find an Asian American actor or actress anywhere to cast for the leading roles in this film?

The columnist also mentions this:

I was talking all this over with an Asian-American friend the other day who posited that perhaps Hollywood doesn’t take the concerns Asian-Americans raise about the white-washing of Asian roles seriously because Asians are stereotypically perceived by many white Americans as being submissive, polite and complacent (“Oh sure, they’ll complain on their blogs about it, but no one reads them anyhow except other Asian-Americans … they’ll get over if we toss Bai Ling in there somewhere … have the screenwriter add an evil, sex-crazed hooker into the story.”). She might have a point.

Maybe it’s about time Asian Americans started speaking up.

Hollywood’s a tough business with an eagle eye on the box office bottom line, and the attitude toward race in casting decisions isn’t likely to change until Asian-Americans band together to show Hollywood shirts the financial impact their united weight can bear by boycotting films they feel white-wash Asian parts, and supporting those that do cast Asian actors in lead roles.

It’s 2009, folks. We have an African-American man in the highest elected office of our country. Can’t we have an adaptation of an Asian-themed series with actual Asian actors playing the lead roles?

You can also check out It’s not a post-racial Hollywood at Daily Herald.com which also talks about this film’s casting.

American Violet

April 18, 2009 Leave a comment

There’s a new film that came out yesterday titled American Violet. The film stars Nicole Beharie, Alfre Woodard, Charles S. Dutton and Michael O’KeefeAmerican Violet is in limited release.

american_violet2

american_violet

American Violet is loosely based on the real life story of the Panhandle Regional Narcotics Task Force case in Texas. Dozens of residents, mostly African Americans, were arrested on charges of selling cocaine.   The film focuses on Dee Roberts, a mother of four, portrayed by Nicole Beharie.  Dee’s character is based on Regina Kelly, who was one of the many residents falsely arrested in Hearne, Texas.

A documentary based on this case, Tulia, Texas was shown on PBS’s Independent Lens earlier this year.

The movie has been receiving some pretty good reviews.  I’m glad to see that whoever cast this film didn’t go the usual Hollywood route when it comes to black actresses by hiring some r&b singer for the leading female role if you know what I mean.  As a matter of fact they cast a newcomer in the leading role of Dee Roberts.  You know this is a rare moment for a black actress who’s also a Julliard graduate.

Check out an interview with Nicole Beharie at Beliefnet.com and an interview with Regina Kelly and American Violet writer Bill Haney at HollywoodChicago.

Is Madea bad for black folks?

March 18, 2009 Leave a comment

Is Tyler Perry’s Madea bad for black folks? That’s the question some people are asking lately. Some are turned off by the cross dressing black male Madea played by Tyler Perry.

Washington Post columnist Courtland Milloy isn’t thrilled about Tyler Perry films.

madea

What’s So Funny About Madea? Nothing.

By Courtland Milloy
Wednesday, February 25, 2009

I went to see the Tyler Perry movie “Madea Goes to Jail,” in which Perry plays a wise-cracking black grandmother, Madea, short for “Mother Dear” and ebonically pronounced “muh deah.”

With an extensive criminal past that includes “supersize stripper,” attempted murderer and check fraud artist, Madea is a near-cult figure among many African Americans, especially women. Thanks in large part to them, Perry’s comedic creation debuted as the No. 1 movie in America over the weekend, raking in $41 million and 34 percent of the weekend moviegoing audience, according to box-office tracker Exhibitor Relations.

At the AMC Magic Johnson Capital Centre 12 in Landover, where Madea is being shown 14 times a day, I was hoping to get a clue as to why this man in drag is so popular. And with the movie featuring guest appearances by Whoopi Goldberg, Dr. Phil, Judge Mathis and Al Sharpton, perhaps I’d even get in a laugh or two.

Boy, was I wrong — on both counts.

All around me you could almost hear the funny bones cracking — deep guttural laughter coming not only from kids in the audience but from my peers in the AARP set, as well.

And there I sat, silently ranting: There is nothing funny about this black man in pantyhose. And where is all of this cross-dressing-black-man stuff coming from, anyway? First, comedians Eddie Murphy and Martin Lawrence star in high-grossing movies as the fattest, ugliest black women that Hollywood makeup artists can conjure up, and now here’s Perry with his gussied-up version of the same butt of the joke.

By the way, I don’t want to hear diddly about Robin Williams as Mrs. Doubtfire or Milton Berle in high heels. Having a black man play super mammy is not the same thing. Perhaps it would be were it not for America’s perverse, systemic and centuries-long efforts to humiliate African men and women and turn them into slaves.

The only good a Madea movie could possibly do would be to remind us that the scars of oppression are deep and enduring, often operating below the level of consciousness, then breaking out in the most bizarre manifestation of self-hate and self-sabotage, including pathetic images on the big screen.

Of course, Perry’s fans don’t see it that way. When I asked some women in the theater if they were at all uneasy about Perry in wigs, lipstick and rouge, they clucked tongues and rolled eyes in a manner that Madea her/himself would no doubt approve.

“Oh, please,” snapped Darlene Johnson, 51. “It’s just comedy.”

Yeah, and misogynistic gansta rap is just music.

Said Sheena Young, also 51: “He’s just multitasking. His initial budget didn’t allow for him to hire all the people he needed so he played them himself. It’s awesome.”

I’m not taking away anything from the 39-year-old Perry’s resourcefulness and ingenuity. He pulled himself up by the bootstraps from a low-income household in New Orleans, started writing and putting on stage plays about Madea (supposedly a composite of women in his life) and went on to become one of the most successful filmmakers in America.

He has a beautiful home and his own studios in Atlanta. He hires lots of young black actors and production personnel and makes considerable contributions to worthy causes.

He is awesome.

It’s just that his movies are awful.

Here’s a typical scene:

Madea’s brother, Uncle Joe, also played by Perry, is a crusty old coot who breathes with the aid of an oxygen tank while smoking marijuana throughout the movie (he even wears a bong around his neck). Madea, ever the boss woman, scolds him mercilessly about the dangers of mixing fire and oxygen. And — here’s where the audience howls — as Madea waddles past, her behind wide as a doorway, Uncle Joe cracks: “King Kong ain’t got nothing on her.”

How’d you like to see that on a movie marquee: Madea the black woman as King Kong? That’s about as funny, say, as a dead monkey cartoon from the New York Post?

It’s not a sign of respect but one of disdain to portray black women as some updated Jemima (that’s what a white character in the movie calls her) from the antebellum South. Sure, all of Perry’s fans claim to know someone like Madea. But in truth, we know nothing — only that she is aging and irrationally angry, existing to clean up everybody’s else’s mess, a linebacker of a house servant whose unmet emotional needs remain a mystery even to the great Dr. Phil himself.

We may laugh at her, but the joke is on us.

This week’s Entertainment Weekly also has an article about Tyler’s films and whether he’s creating stereotypes.

Tyler Perry: The Controversy Over His Hit Movies

”Madea Goes to Jail” has grossed more than $75 million to date, but is its creator reinforcing stereotypes? And even if he is, how do you weigh that against the good he’s doing? Inside black America’s secret culture war

By Benjamin Svetkey, Margeaux Watson, Alynda Wheat

If you happened to buy a ticket to Tyler Perry’s Madea Goes to Jail without knowing what you were getting into, you might think you’d stumbled onto a cheery comedy about an overgrown granny with anger-management issues. A black Mrs. Doubtfire, say, with car chases and reefer jokes. You’d never suspect that you had strayed into the midst of a culture war — one that’s been simmering inside the African-American community since before blackface. ”I loved working with Tyler Perry, but he’s a controversial, complicated figure,” says Viola Davis, who costarred in Madea Goes to Jail and recently snagged an Oscar nomination for Doubt. ”People feel the images [in his movies] are very stereotypical, and black people are frustrated because they feel we should be more evolved. But there are very few black images in Hollywood, so black people are going to his movies. That’s the dichotomy. Tyler Perry is making money.”

A lot of money. Jail has already earned more than $75 million, making it Perry’s highest-grossing film to date. And his seven movies — starting with his 2005 big-screen drag debut as Madea in Diary of a Mad Black Woman — have grossed more than $350 million combined, putting him on track to join John Singleton and Keenen Ivory Wayans as one of the most successful black filmmakers ever. He may already be the most divisive. At a time when Barack Obama is presenting the world with a bold new image of black America, Perry is being slammed for filling his films with regressive, down-market archetypes. In many of his films there’s a junkie prostitute, a malaprop-dropping uncle, and Madea, a tough-talking grandma the size of a linebacker (”Jemima the Hutt,” one character calls her). ”Tyler keeps saying that Madea is based on black women he’s known, and maybe so,” says Donald Bogle, acclaimed author of Toms, Coons, Mulattoes, Mammies, & Bucks: An Interpretive History of Blacks in American Films. ”But Madea does have connections to the old mammy type. She’s mammy-like. If a white director put out this product, the black audience would be appalled.”

I’ve seen most of his movies including Diary of a Mad Black Woman, Madea’s Family Reunion, The Family That Preys, Why Did I Get Married and Daddy’s Little Girls. But the only Tyler Perry movie that I really enjoyed was Why Did I Get Married. The Family That Preys was alright.  The rest of his movies were just okay. I haven’t seen Meet The Browns. I’ll catch that one on cable or Netflix like I did Daddy’s Little Girls and Madea’s Family Reunion.   I saw The Family That Preys through Netflix. I haven’t seen Madea Goes To Jail. I’ll catch that one on cable or Netflix.

So far Madea Goes to Jail has made over $75 million. I’m happy for Tyler cause it’s good to see a black director and producer doing well in Hollywood (even though he’s based in Atlanta) but with the exception of Why Did I Get Married, most of his films are just okay in my opinion.  Not surprising is the fact that there are some folks who are angry over the fact that Tyler’s movies are doing very well at the boxoffice.  Could it be a total dislike towards Tyler Perry from some white folks or anger over his depiction of black women and accusations of stereotypes from some black folks?  Check out the free for all at the IMDB message board for Madea Goes To Jail.

At a time when Barack Obama is presenting the world with a bold new image of black America, Perry is being slammed for filling his films with regressive, down-market archetypes. In many of his films there’s a junkie prostitute, a malaprop-dropping uncle, and Madea, a tough-talking grandma the size of a linebacker (”Jemima the Hutt,” one character calls her). ”Tyler keeps saying that Madea is based on black women he’s known, and maybe so,” says Donald Bogle, acclaimed author of Toms, Coons, Mulattoes, Mammies, & Bucks: An Interpretive History of Blacks in American Films. ”But Madea does have connections to the old mammy type. She’s mammy-like. If a white director put out this product, the black audience would be appalled.”

You can read the entire Entertainment Weekly article here.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.